All posts by Cassie Creswell

Keep ICE’s Big Tech partners out of our kids’ counseling services!

Mental health is a prerequisite for learning, and all kids deserve access to mental healthcare. As the Trump administration ramps up its mass deportation campaign across the country, the already urgent need for mental health services for students is only increasing.

Chicago has been the focus of this campaign for many weeks, and, concerningly, Chicago Public Schools (CPS) is directing families and students to a for-profit mental health tech company, Hazel Health, that’s just merged with another startup with deep connections to one of ICE’s Big Tech partners, Palantir.

The Parent Coalition for Student Privacy wrote to the Chicago Board of Education along with other advocacy groups to urge the Board to address the inadequate protection for student data in Hazel Health’s contract with CPS just last week. After sending that letter, news emerged about Hazel Health’s merger.

Here’s what we know so far…

What to know about Hazel Health

Last fall, CPS signed a no-cost contract for Hazel Health’s telehealth counseling services for high school students and rolled out these services in March. The services Hazel is providing to CPS students are being underwritten by United Healthcare for students’ whose own public or private insurance doesn’t cover these counseling sessions. Hazel is privately-held, and its venture capital investors include Bain Capital and the firm of a heiress in the Walton family.

CPS’ contract with Hazel is set to renew automatically for two years on December 31, 2025. But if the Board of Ed gives notice by December 1st, the contract can be modified or canceled.

As mentioned above, last week, Illinois Families for Public Schools, Legal Action Chicago, Legal Council for Health Justice, NAMI Chicago, NASW-Illinois Chapter, and the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy, sent a letter to the Chicago Board of Ed and CEO/Superintendent urging them to review, rectify and—if necessary—cancel their contract with Hazel Health because of major issues with student data protection. You can read that letter here.

Why would advocates urge the Board to consider ending a contract for “free” mental health services for students at a time when there is ever increasing need and demand for counseling services?

First and foremost—nothing is free; it’s a truism at this point that free tech means you’re the product, not the customer, and Hazel’s parental consent form raises numerous red flags along these lines. It is both broad and vague—parents must agree that Hazel can use their child’s identifiable data for any research and development purposes. On top of that, parents also must agree that their child’s sensitive mental health and other data may be stolen (“illegally accessed”) once Hazel holds it.

Hazel’s website also has marketing trackers from Amazon, Google and Facebook—something that ed tech vendors can’t use under Illinois’ Student Online Personal Protection Act (SOPPA).

And Hazel’s contract doesn’t provide any details about what sort of highly sensitive data Hazel is collecting—even though that’s something required by SOPPA! As a result, families don’t know: Are these counseling sessions recorded? Are they transcribed? Are students’ eye movement, facial expressions and keystrokes tracked? Is any of this information combined with the medical data and screening assessments Hazel holds? No information about any of these types of data are even disclosed in CPS’ contract. IL-FPS has a more detailed explainer on Hazel’s privacy issues here.

And now Hazel has merged with Palantir-partner Little Otter…

Hazel announced this week that it merged with another mental health tech startup, Little Otter. Little Otter has an AI-based platform and uses the data from its clients to train its algorithms. All of Little Otter therapy sessions are recorded, and it’s unclear whether information from those recordings is being utilized as input for its AI platform.

Little Otter’s founder and CEO, Rebecca Egger, is one of the so-called “Palantir mafia”, having gotten her start in Silicon Valley at Palantir. Little Otter’s tech leads, including their previous CTO, COO and head of data engineering, are also all former Palantir employees.

Little Otter still has close ties to Palantir as one of its Global Builder startups that “use Palantir as a product multiplier to accelerate their missions.”

If you’re not familiar with surveillance tech behemoth Palantir, it’s been a major federal contractor for many years, and is now playing a key role in the Trump administration’s plan to merge data across federal agencies, including the IRS and the Social Security Administration.

One of those agencies is ICE. Palantir has been described as “the corporate backbone of ICE that the agency is relying on for surveillance and deportations,” and they are a—if not the—major tech partner in the Trump administration’s mass deportation plan.

What does this mean for CPS’ contract with Hazel?

Is data from CPS students’ online counseling sessions already being used to train AI algorithms? Will it be used that way in the future because of Hazel’s merger with Little Otter?

In response to the Trump administration’s ramping up federal law enforcement and military presence in Chicago, CPS has highlighted Hazel as a resource for students experiencing fear, anxiety and trauma, as communities across the city are terrorized by ICE’s secret police.

Which leads to another question: Could information from recordings or transcriptions of children’s counseling sessions eventually end up in a federal database? (The Chief Information Officer at the Department of Health and Human Services is also ex-Palantir.)

In light of all these questions, it’s simply not ok for the Chicago Board to allow the contract with Hazel automatically renew. CPS should review it, fix it—if that’s even possible—and if it can’t be fixed, cancel it.

Handing students’ most sensitive data over to tech broligarchs building the surveillance state to hunt down those students or their families is entirely unacceptable.

Free tech is never free, and that’s especially true in 2025.

What can you do?

If you are a Chicagoan, please advocate with their school district leaders about the existing contract with Hazel!

If you are not in Chicago, find out if your school district or state already has a contract with Hazel Health or is considering signing one. Hazel is in 19 states and 180 school districts, including many of the largest in the country: Los Angeles Unified School District, Miami-Dade and Broward County in Florida, Houston and Dallas ISDs in Texas, Fairfax Co VA, Clark Co NV, Jeffco CO, and the School District of Philadelphia.

You can check the Hazel website, and also Google for “Hazel Health” along with the name of your school district, state department of education or health or state’s lobbyist registration site. The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services just signed a contract with Hazel which covers about 1/3 of the state. Iowa has a partnership with Hazel, as does Rhode Island. In both Virginia and in Georgia, Hazel is an approved vendor for the states’ respective departments of education.

Any and all of these type of contracts need scrutiny, as do any consent forms Hazel is using.

Hazel is also not the only tech company pushing to increase its market share in this space, any outsourcing to third-party tech firms merits a closer look. The data involved is extremely sensitive. There have been several significant ransomware attacks on school districts’ mental health data in recent years including  Los Angeles and Minneapolis, with devastating information released about students and staff on the dark web. A major breach of a Finnish mental healthcare startup in 2020 resulted in blackmail attempts and deaths by suicide. CPS itself had a ransomware attack that exposed data of more than 700K students’ in early 2025, including Medicaid ID numbers.

Please reach out if you need assistance with researching what is happening in your district or state:  info@studentprivacymatters.org. Even if your state does not have especially robust student privacy laws, your advocacy alone can make a difference!

Privacy and other issues with Hazel Health telehealth counseling in Chicago Public Schools

Illinois Families for Public Schools sent a letter to the Chicago Board of Education on May 5, 2025 with a list of concerns about privacy and other issues with a new telehealth program where mental health services are provided by for-profit company Hazel Health. IL-FPS urges the Board to answer the questions posed in the letter and revise the consent forms that parents agree to when they sign their student up for services.

The acute need for additional access to mental health services for the students of Chicago Public Schools should not require the young people receiving those services to waive their rights to privacy, nor have their personal information exploited commercially.

You can read the full letter here. The four primary concerns presented include:

  • Only one of two contracts with Hazel Health are available on the CPS website. The list of data collected that is included in one of the contracts does not appear to be complete; it does not list any medical information or video or audio data as being collected, which does not make sense given the nature of the services provided by Hazel Health. Under the Student Online Personal Protection Act, parents and the public should have access to a list of what information is being shared with a third-party company.
  • Pages on the Hazel Health website that parents are directed to include tracking by Amazon and Alphabet (Google’s parent company). This type of commercial surveillance, especially for a site providing mental health services, is not acceptable.
  • The terms in the consent/authorization form that parents agree to in order to sign students up for services are deeply problematic and conflict with state law and CPS policy. Among other things, parents agree that data shared with Hazel “may not be secure and may be illegally accessed by a third party” and that their child’s information can be used for commercial and research purposes.
  • Online job review sites report that caseloads for Hazel Health therapists may be up to ten clients per day or 35 clients per week. This raises issues about working conditions for clinicians and the impact of that on the students who are receiving services.

The questions for the Board posed in the letter are:

  1. What data elements of students’ covered information are being collected, transmitted and held by Hazel Health and its subcontractors?
  2. What student records and covered information generated in the course of receiving services from Hazel Health are shared back to CPS? Which CPS employees have access to them? Who determines this? How are these student records shared?
  3. How is confidentiality for students aged 12-17 years protected with respect to limitations on parental access?
  4. How many students does one therapist see per day and per week?
  5. How much time do therapists have to prepare for and respond to client sessions?
  6. What, if any, direct, real-time communication takes place between clinicians and school staff?

Illinois Families for Public Schools urges the Board to (i) provide families with answers to all the above questions, (ii) post any and all legal agreements between Hazel Health, United Healthcare (the funder of the current program) and the Chicago Board of Education publicly on the CPS website, (iii) revise and reissue any consent and policy documents that Hazel Health requires families to agree to in order to for children to access services, and, if needed, renegotiate any agreements with Hazel Health to ensure that no student information or records provided to or processed by them will be used for anything other than providing telehealth services.

New York City rolled out a telehealth mental health program last fall that was a contract between Talkspace and the city’s Department of Health that has been widely promoted by the NYC Department of Education for public school students there as well. It has had major privacy issues (see here and here) flagged by the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy and other privacy advocates. Ultimately, the contract between NYC and Talkspace was rewritten, but problems with tracking users on their website have yet to be resolved.